Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 (2011)

The latest and the last in a series of films that shaped the cultural scenery of many a kid in the past decade, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2, is a satisfactory and emotional end to a long journey of magic and the art of growing up.

Naming generations with clever names like the ‘Obama-generation’, ‘Generation x’, ‘the Millenials’ has become a trend in its own right. The ‘Harry Potter’ generation, born in the late 80’s, early 90’s period grew up with the book series, hitting ages similtaneously with the main characters, Harry Potter, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Considered a fantasy franchise, the core of the story still lies in the coming-of-age tale of the three main characters. With the Deathly Hallows we see the culmination of that journey, and a glimpse into their future.

Having really dug the Pt. 1 of this divided film, I was hoping Pt. 2 would crank it all up to another level. Pt. 2 delivered on some occasion, but not with every aspect of the film. Whilst the emotion was tuned to a hundred, revealing the true nature of all the characters, rewarding some and punishing others, the action and excitement was lacking. Although filled with gruesome scenes and great drama, the final battle between Harry Potter and Voldemort felt more underwhelming than it did in the books. From a filmmaker’s point of view I can see how a wand battle isn’t where you want to end things, but as the films have always stayed remarkably true to the actual writing, not many changes were made in the Hogwarts showdown.

The film continues where the previous left off, Dobby’s death and an imminent takeover of Hogwarts. Snape’s grip over the school has left its mark on the previously lively and glorious hub of magic and turned it into a ordered, rigid, dark compound of oppressed students. A force de résistance lives on in the hidden corners, led by the unlikely hero yet to prove his honour, Neville Longbottom (played by Matthew Lewis). When Mr. Potter (Radcliffe) returns, the final battle ensues. Ron (Grint and Hermione (Watson) hook up. Horcruxes get destroyed. People die, favourite people. Final battle happens. Harry dies. No wait! He lives. The boy lives. Voldemort dies. Snape cries into a bottle. Gets redemption. Harry and Ginny (Bonnie Wright) have ugly kids and name them after former principals (Albus Severus Potter). Everyone is happy (expect maybe the Weasley’s, their body count was kind of big).

Ah, don’t blame me for spoilers. I mean, who really thought that there was going to be a Voldemort victory. The world of fantasy is happy and great and brilliant and everyone succeeds! (Although HP does have a quite dark side to it, to such an extent that I wouldn’t call it a kids franchise anymore) I don’t know how people who haven’t read the books keep up; or how much they enjoy the films without them. I actually found the book to be much more impactful than this escapade, especially when it came to Snape’s faith. His story of redemption, faithfulness to the good cause, the mercy he showed Dumbledore and the love he had for Harry’s mother was for me the best character reveal in the whole series, but felt a bit cheesy in the film. I didn’t feel that his story came out the way it should’ve.

And the film made Dumbledore seem like a complete dick.

Although I’ve read all the books a few times when I was younger, and seen all the films mostly the premiere day, I never bought into the fanatics of it all. Although consistently good, the film franchise doesn’t really compare to the books and their influence on kids. If nothing, the series inspired a generation of kids to read, which is a total win in itself.

It’s going to be interesting to see whether this gets recognized by the awards season. Lord of the Rings broke the stigma on the Oscars and fantasy, but the level it was made was entirely its own and unfortunately Harry Potter is nowhere near. Britain will probably acknowledge its biggest production ever, and hopefully give a nod to Alan Rickman as well. A fan favourite, Rickman has carried the show since the beginning, being by far the best thing about the first three films and delivering the most layered performance of this latest installation. Lord Voldemort never turned out to be the scary guy he was in the books, since his evil was more about the idea of him, rather than his corporeal self. Fiennes’ is great though, but has been a lot more dominant in other roles (see Schindler’s List and Red Dragon f.e.). Snape then, for a long time served the purpose of the actual villain, the ominous presence in Harry’s life that was more than just a shadow and a thought.

The main weakness in the film then, is its Harry-centricity. I mean he was never the most interesting character of the bunch (nor was Radcliffe the best actor). There were a lot of great characters that we didn’t get to say goodbye to, most prominently Remus Lupin, who’s death was only marked by a few second shot of him and his wife lying on the floor dead amongst other bodies, cries and devestation. Harry’s relationship to him was huge, he ended up as auror due to his example, another end result that got left out. The last book was so meaty, that even when broken down to two films, 5 hours of action fantasy, some of the very best details and storylines had to be cut. An unfortunate matter, that underlies the difference of storytelling in books and film.

Produced down to a t, visually incredible Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt.2 is just fine, and for fans a great farewell to the series. A cutthrough of the best British talent, and a satisfactory end to a long, long journey it’s about time that Harry Potter got his happy ending. The films were surely be missed, but not more so than the literature that sparked a high in reading and fantasy.

And please, see it in 2D. 3D is for muggles.

You Will Like Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 If…

– you liked the previous 78 films.

7.5 / 10
(If I’d be giving a Pt.1 + Pt.2 grade, this’d go up a point.)

13 responses to “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 (2011)

  1. Yes I agree that there was a little too much Harry that everyone else was relegated to the background. At a minimum, I would have wanted more of Ron and Hermione but their roles were surprisingly subdued. Glad to hear you liked Part 1, we seem to be in the minority or something ;)

  2. Hi Anna,

    Loving the new theme, very swish!!

    I have not read your review as I am trying (and failing for the best part) to stay fairly fresh for my viewing of the film.

    I hope you are well


    • Thanks custard, I thought it was a bit more light than the previous, more appropriate for summer. I totally get what you mean, I’ve found that reading too many reviews leaves me with too many prenotions that i can’t shake. You too!

  3. I totally agree about the support characters getting killed without much thought (Remus and Ron’s brother to name two) but Neville Longbottom got his chance to shine which I thought was a plus despite the actor playing him being one of the weakest.

    I wasn’t too bothered about the Harry-centricity because I guess the final chapter had to be about him. But a flaw that has plagued the film series is how it has had to follow Rowling’s depiction of the characters and hasn’t taken into consideration what characters have worked best on the big screen. It was criminal to lose Gary Oldman so quickly and other top actors didn’t have enough screen time in various films including Deathly Hallows. Hagrid is hardly in part 2 for instance and Delores Umbridge was brilliantly conceived for the films (more of her would have been good).

    • Yeah big names like Emma Thompson should be on screen for more than two seconds. I guess Rowling had to approve changes if they were made, I don’t think she saw the difference in expressing in cinema and in writing.

  4. I have to say, that Rickman was SO underused in all the other films. This film was also HIS redemption in my opinion. I’m so glad that Snape finally got his story told properly. He was too much of a comic-relief in some of the earlier films. And you’re right. Dumbledore really was made to look like a dick in the end.

  5. I really loved this final installment and I really want to see it again before it leaves the theaters. I think Goblet of Fire is still my favorite (Sedimental reasons and the beginning of Voldemort), but this in addition to the Deathly Hallows 1 is easily right up there in the best.

    Deathly Hallows 1 can’t stand up on it’s own without the second film, but together they are a force to be reckoned with.

    Also, I’ve never read the books and I followed the movies for the Potter storyline and I was satisfied. If the books are better (isn’t that always the case) I don’t think I’ll be compelled to read them now that the film franchise is over.

  6. Man I feel so left out for not having seen this yet. I’m hoping to see it this Friday. Thanks for the heads up about the 3D, I’ll save my money, thanks!

  7. Pingback: My Five-Year-Old-Self has found satisfaction. | Lemon City III·

  8. Pingback: LAMBScores: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 | FameMonster.info·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s