The King of Comedy (1982)

Better to be king for a night than schmuck for a lifetime.

The Robert De Niro and Martin Scorsese collaboration has brought us some of the best films in history. Someone might argue with me saying that, but by starting to throw out names like Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and Goodfellas majority of these contending voices would quiet down. All in all, De Niro has been Scorsese’s ‘muse’ on eight occasion, and for me their venture onto the realm of comedy has been underappreciated. The King Of Comedy, a story of a passionate, fanatic mind of an aspiring comedian Rupert Pupkin (De Niro) obsessed with his talkshow host idol is one of the most underrated Scorsese films, and now more relevant than ever with it’s depiction of celebrity and the culture surrounding it.

Jerry Lewis plays Jerry Langford a late-night institution that is idolized by Pumpkin. In Rupert’s mind Langford is his friend and mentor, ready to give him his big break on the show, hugely popular coast-to-coast. In reality Rupert has only met Langford once after helping him escape from a deluded female fan, Masha (Sandra Bernhard) who is sexually obsessed with Langford and believes she’s in an intimate relationship with him. Langford is an especially private person, living alone in a massive house and reluctant to embrace the fame his succesful show has brought him, he appears rude to fans due to his will to shield himself from intrusion and the before mentioned ‘nutcases’ like Masha and Rupert.

Rupert comes up with a plan to get his big night after being disregarded at the Langford Show headquarters and asks Masha (who’s wonderfully insane BTW) to help him kidnap Langford in order to blackmail the crew to let him do his stand-up routine as the first guest whilst Masha holds a gun to Langford’s head. An ingenious plan, that for some reason works and Rupert gets to do his bit and prove his highschool object-of-admiration, Rita, a stunning bar-tender, that he’s not the loser she thought he was.

The King Of Comedy walks the thin line of dramedy, it’s in part hilarious but behind it all lies a social commentary on the perils of fame and fanatism. The celebrity-culture is now bigger than ever, and a lot of people are obsessed with celebrities every move, mistake and fashion choice. Gossip sells millions of magazines a day, and private life is something the adored movie and television stars are rarely acquainted with. The pressure of promoting and intense competition all too often dictates the success and even the production of films is based on profit; quality is often compromised in order to maximise it. Is this the result of the industry itself, the media that puts celebrities on a petistole or the fans that worship beside it, I don’t know, but this film takes a good look in the showbiz mirror and depicts the insanity involved both on- and offscreen.

The characters are often stereotypical fame-workers, showbiz baffoons, grumpy, ‘unappreciative’ celebs, mental fans, people with big dreams trying to break through. As said in the film, the bottom’s the best place to start climbing up the ladder leading to celebrity and fame, as it were some kind of far-end goal in life, a prize only the best and most talented, beautiful people reach. Kids now don’t want to be moviestars, they want to be celebrities. The phenomena of reality tv made the whole thing even bigger; no need to be talented, you just need to get screentime and your path to glory has begun. These kinds of disillusionments that cloud the minds of many today is what’s driving Rupert Pumpkin’s head. He doesn’t have a plan of paying his dues in the dark bars of Manhattan, performing his stand-up routine to crowds of nine to make his way into the limelight. He wants it know, and Langford can give it to him. He can give him the connections the exposure, that will make him an overnight star, a house-hold name. And the funny thing is, this is were the film ends. His crazy antics land him in jail, making his claim to fame the craziest, and perhaps at the same time, the cleverest, in the history of New York late night.

Many go as far as to say that De Niro’s portrayal of Rupert Pupkin is his best role ever (I’m still hailing for Raging Bull), and TBH they’re not far off the mark. He transforms into this lovable, dillusional loser to such an extent that by the end I was sure I was watching a True Life- documentary. His laugh is magnificient, the posture, the strut, the lost look in his eyes, and the final enjoyment, the realization of his dreams, his own show all are inpeccable details that De Niro colours the character of Rupert with. In the end I guess it’s a matter of preference, but all in all this film, and De Niro’s performance has been seen by too few, and appreciated by even less. Ahead of it’s time, The King Of Comedy is on the surface an entertaining life story of passion, inside a look on the destructing and reinforcing power of fame.

9 / 10

I’m sure you can understand. Doing the kind of show I’m doing, it’s mind-boggling. There’s so much stuff that comes down… you can’t keep your head clear. And if that’s the case, I’m wrong. You’re right. I’m wrong. If I’m wrong, I apologize. I’m just a human being… with all of the foibles and all of the traps… the show, the pressure… the groupies, the autograph hounds… the crew, the incompetence… those behind-the-scenes you think are your friends. You’re not sure if you’ll be there tomorrow… because of their incompetence. There are wonderful pressures that make every day… a glowing, radiant day in your life. It’s terrific. OK, if all of that means nothing… if I’m wrong,in spite of all that… then I apologize. I’m sorry. If you accept my apology… I think we should shake hands. We’ll forget the whole thing. I won’t press charges. You could be in deep trouble… but I will not press charges.

You will like The King of Comedy if…
– you enjoyd the likes of Late Night With Conan O’Brien.
– there’s no such thing as bad times with De Niro.
– you think escapism can be smart.


4 responses to “The King of Comedy (1982)

  1. Erinomainen arvostelu! Pelkkä ajatuskin Pupkinin ja Mashan sekoilusta pistää tyrskityttämään. The King of Comedy todella jää syrjään Scorsesen mahti tuotannossa ja ihan suotta.

  2. I love this movie. Definitely one of Scorsese’s most underrated gems, and it always seemed to me to be one of DeNiro’s most overlooked performances. Good to see someone giving it a shout. :-)

    • Yeah I guess loads of people were expecting something different due to their previous collaboration, but taken away from that context it truly is brilliant imo.

  3. De Niro is perfect as Pupkin, and this is one of Scorsese’s must underrated works, which is a real shame, because this is some real great dark material here. Good Review!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s